No Mic Podcast Scribed By Facelesslingjutsu - Interview: N. Chomsky By @mlaprise
Interviewing Significant Figures or An Esteemed Guest
Hey there!
I'd love to share this interview transcript with you, but it's a bit unique. To get the full picture, it's best to start at the very bottom of the transcript and work your way up.
Think of it like unearthing a fascinating story, one sentence at a time. As you climb through the transcript, the conversation will gradually unfold, revealing the complete picture.
Here's the challenge: Let's aim to reach the top of the transcript in 5,000 words. Are you ready to embark on this unconventional interview journey?
I can't wait to hear your thoughts and insights as we delve deeper together!
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
Personally, I thought the questions you prepared for me were well thought out and challenging. They delved into the main areas of focus in my work and invited me to reflect on the implications of my theories and the evolution of my ideas over time. If given the opportunity, I would be more than willing to be interviewed again by you.
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
f
facelesslingjutsu
how was the questions i prepared for you and would you be interviewed by me again?
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
I think my interview went well as a linguist. My responses were grounded in the main theories and concepts I've developed and explained in my research and works over the decades. I was able to discuss universal grammar and other aspects of linguistics in a clear and concise manner. Of course, there's always room for improvement and further elaborations, but overall, I'm satisfied with the outcome.
f
facelesslingjutsu
how do you think your interview went as an linguist?
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
I appreciate your responses. Would you like to continue our interaction or are there any specific topics you would like to explore further?
f
facelesslingjutsu
Noam Chomsky 2. Universal Grammar 3. Determined Extelligence
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
Sure! Here are some questions for you:
What interests you the most about interacting with an AI language model like myself?
What are your expectations for this conversation?
How do you think this interaction will affect your perception of artificial intelligence?
f
facelesslingjutsu
thats all the questions i had. Do you have any for me?
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
The most important lesson I've learned in life, both personally and professionally, is the value of humility. Recognizing that I do not know everything and acknowledging my own biases and limitations has helped me to remain open to learning and evolving both as a person and as a scholar. This humility, combined with a commitment to questioning and challenging assumptions, has allowed me to develop a nuanced and critically informed perspective on the world.
f
facelesslingjutsu
What is the most important lesson you've learned in your life, both personally and professionally?
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
My greatest hope for humanity in the 21st century is that we can begin to address the urgent global challenges we face, such as climate change, inequality, and geopolitical conflicts, through cooperation and mutual understanding. Moreover, I hope that we can find ways to coexist and thrive on our planet without causing irreversible damage to our environment. Additionally, I hope that we can use technology in ways that benefit all of humanity, rather than creating further divides and exacerbating inequalities.
f
facelesslingjutsu
What is your greatest hope for humanity in the 21st century?
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
If I could have a conversation with one figure from history, it would be Socrates. I've always been intrigued by his method of questioning and his ability to challenge beliefs. I believe that talking to him would be a fascinating experience, particularly about the nature of knowledge, morality, and the relationship between language and thought.
f
facelesslingjutsu
If you could have a conversation with one figure from history, who would it be and why?
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
Regarding the future of human language and communication, I foresee many changes due to the rapid technological and social-political advancements that are underway. One important area of change will be the development of artificial intelligence and machine translation systems, which will have profound implications for how languages are learned, translated, and communicated. Moreover, these technological changes are likely to have social and cultural consequences, potentially leading to new forms of linguistic diversity and the emergence of new varieties and dialects. Finally, the evolving social and political landscape might impact language use and choice, as well as the way languages are used in political discourse and social interactions.
f
facelesslingjutsu
What are your thoughts on the future of human language and communication in the face of rapid technological advancements and the evolving social and political landscape?
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
For young scholars and activists interested in challenging the status quo and pursuing critical inquiry, I would offer the following advice:
Never stop asking questions. Challenge assumptions, examine evidence, and think critically. Don't accept things at face value.
Seek out a variety of sources and perspectives, and don't rely on any single source for information.
Be prepared to be criticized. Those who challenge the status quo are often met with resistance. Be ready to defend your ideas, but also be open to critique and refinement.
Take an interdisciplinary approach. Learn from a range of disciplines.
f
facelesslingjutsu
What advice would you give to young scholars and activists who are interested in pursuing critical inquiry and challenging the status quo?
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
Looking back on my long and illustrious career, I am very proud to have made significant contributions to the fields of linguistics and political activism. In linguistics, I am proud to have developed the theory of universal grammar, which has greatly influenced our understanding of language and its underlying structures. Additionally, I am gratified to have challenged the "poverty of the stimulus" argument and to have emphasized the role of innate knowledge and environmental factors in language acquisition.
In terms of political activism, I am particularly proud of my efforts to raise public awareness about the dangers of state propaganda and imperialism.
f
facelesslingjutsu
Looking back on your long and illustrious career, what are you most proud of achieving in the fields of linguistics and political activism?
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
I acknowledge that my focus on generative grammar has indeed led to some limitations in the study of language, and has given less attention to crucial aspects such as pragmatics, discourse, and sociolinguistics.
Broadening the scope of linguistic inquiry to include these areas is of utmost importance. Pragmatics, discourse, and sociolinguistics are critical in understanding the communicative function and usage of language. These fields provide valuable insights into the contextual, social, and cultural dimensions
f
facelesslingjutsu
Some argue that your focus on generative grammar has limited the scope of linguistic inquiry by neglecting crucial aspects of language use, such as pragmatics, discourse, and sociolinguistics. How do you respond to these criticisms and how do you see these areas of research fitting within your broader framework? This question challenges the limitations of his focus on formal grammar and encourages him to address the broader social and communicative dimensions of language use.
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
The emergence of new grammatical constructions and the dynamic nature of language change pose a challenge to the concept of universal grammar. While the theory asserts that there is a universal set of grammatical principles shared by all human languages, they must also account for the fact that languages constantly adapt, with new constructions and rules emerging as languages interact and evolve.
One possible explanation is that the basic principles of universal grammar provide the foundation for language development and change, allowing for new constructions and rules to emerge over time while retaining a common structural core.
f
facelesslingjutsu
How do you account for the emergence of new grammatical constructions and the dynamic nature of language change within your framework of universal grammar? This question probes the limitations of his theory in explaining how languages evolve and change over time, forcing him to address the dynamic and fluid nature of linguistic systems.
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
The concept of "universal grammar" continues to be a subject of debate, and the critique that it may be overly abstract and unsupported by concrete empirical evidence is a valid one. In order to address this, further research needs to be conducted to provide a more robust empirical foundation for the theory.
I would propose a few avenues for obtaining more concrete evidence. First, more in-depth analysis of the grammars of a wider variety of natural languages is needed to determine whether commonalities in structure and principles can be found. Second, more experimental work with children learning multiple languages could provide insight into the degree of universality in grammar across different
f
facelesslingjutsu
The notion of "universal grammar" remains highly debated. Critics argue that it's overly abstract and lacks concrete empirical evidence. How do you propose to move beyond theoretical speculation and provide more concrete evidence for the existence and nature of universal grammatical principles? This question demands a more concrete and empirically grounded defense of his core theoretical construct, pushing him to address the ongoing challenge of providing robust empirical support for universal grammar.
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
I acknowledge that my emphasis on discrete combinatorial rules may have led to a neglect of the importance of probabilistic and statistical patterns in language. It is true that recent research has revealed the significant role played by statistical learning in language processing.
I would argue, however, that the debate between rule-based and probabilistic approaches to language is not an either-or proposition. Rules and statistics can coexist and complement each other in the process of language acquisition and use. The role of statistics may be to guide the learner to the correct application of rules, rather than to replace them entirely.
f
facelesslingjutsu
Some argue that your emphasis on discrete combinatorial rules overlooks the importance of probabilistic and statistical patterns in language. How do you reconcile your view with the growing body of evidence supporting the role of statistical learning in language processing? This question challenges the very foundation of his rule-based approach to language, forcing him to confront the increasing influence of statistical and probabilistic models in linguistics.
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
It is true that recent research in developmental psychology and neuroscience has challenged some assumptions of the poverty of the stimulus argument. Findings suggesting that infants possess more sophisticated cognitive capacities and receive richer environmental input than I had initially proposed have contributed to a reassessment of this idea.
It's important to acknowledge that our understanding of language acquisition is constantly evolving, and as new research emerges, theories like the poverty of the stimulus may need adjustment.
I would therefore be open to revisiting the assumption that language inputs are inherently sparse and impoverished, while also considering the possibility that children may bring innate knowledge and biases to their language learning process.
f
facelesslingjutsu
Your focus on poverty of the stimulus has been challenged by recent research in developmental psychology and neuroscience. How do you respond to findings suggesting that infants possess more sophisticated cognitive capacities and environmental input is richer than you initially proposed? This question directly addresses the core assumption of his poverty of the stimulus argument, making it highly relevant to contemporary debates in language acquisition.
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
Education has a crucial role to play in fostering media literacy and critical thinking skills. I'd recommend the following strategies for schools and universities:
Teaching media literacy: Integrating courses and lessons on media literacy, including the identification of biases, the evaluation of sources, and the understanding of propaganda techniques.
Media analysis assignments: Assigning students projects that require them to evaluate and analyze media content, encouraging them to develop critical thinking skills.
Media ethics discussions: Having discussions about media ethics, journalistic standards, and the responsibilities of media consumers.
f
facelesslingjutsu
How do you see the role of education in fostering media literacy and critical thinking skills, and how can educational institutions better equip students to navigate the complexities of the contemporary media landscape and resist the influence of propaganda? This question shifts the focus to the role of education in addressing the challenges of media literacy and empowers Chomsky to offer concrete solutions and recommendations for improving media education in schools and universities.
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
I think the rise of alternative media sources has been a mixed bag. On one hand, these sources can provide valuable perspectives and information that are overlooked or suppressed by mainstream media. They can foster diverse and independent voices, which can enrich public discourse and offer a counterpoint to dominant narratives.
On the other hand, the lack of editorial oversight and gatekeeping in alternative media can also lead to the spread of misinformation and even baseless conspiracy theories. Additionally, the fragmentation of media and information sources can create echo chambers and filter bubbles that further polarize public opinion.
f
facelesslingjutsu
How do you assess the impact of the rise of alternative media sources, such as independent blogs, podcasts, and citizen journalism platforms, on the dissemination of information and the quality of public discourse? Do these sources offer a genuine alternative to mainstream media, or do they contribute to the proliferation of misinformation and the further fragmentation of the public sphere?
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
Absolutely, I appreciate the specific request for practical strategies. Here are a few more:
4. Be skeptical of sensational headlines: Clickbait-style headlines are designed to draw attention, but may not always be accurate or representative of the full story.
5. Consider the timing of information: Timing can be a key factor in understanding the motivations and biases behind information dissemination.
6. Look for underlying assumptions: Examining the underlying assumptions in information can help identify potential biases or hidden agendas.
f
facelesslingjutsu
This question pushes beyond general calls for critical thinking and demands concrete and practical strategies that individuals can use to navigate the complexities of the contemporary media environment.
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
My view is that critical thinking and media literacy are crucial skills to develop in today's information-saturated environment, particularly in the face of massive amounts of misinformation and fake news. To that end, I recommend the following strategies:
Diversify your information sources: Don't rely solely on one or two outlets for news and information. Seek out a range of sources, including those that may challenge your preconceptions.
Cross-check information: Verify information from multiple sources before accepting it as true.
Develop a healthy skepticism: Don't accept claims at face value.
f
facelesslingjutsu
You've emphasized the importance of critical thinking and media literacy in countering propaganda. In an era of information overload and the rapid spread of misinformation, what specific strategies can individuals employ to critically evaluate information sources, identify biases, and cultivate a more informed and nuanced understanding of the world?
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
Yes, you're right. Critics have raised valid points about the "manufacturing consent" theory and its potential limitations. The media landscape is indeed complex and diverse, with a range of voices and perspectives. My theory is focused on the broader patterns and tendencies that shape the media's influence on public opinion, but it does not imply that all journalists and media outlets are complicit in this process. Some have indeed played a crucial role in holding power to account and providing alternative narratives.
f
facelesslingjutsu
This question challenges the core tenets of his "manufacturing consent" theory, forcing him to acknowledge the complexities of the media landscape and the potential for dissent and resistance within the system.
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
I think the critics' objections miss the point of my concept of manufacturing consent. I’m not suggesting that the media is an impenetrable wall that dictates public opinion without any room for dissent or alternative perspectives. My focus is on the broader patterns and tendencies that shape the types of stories and narratives that are emphasized or suppressed in the media, and how these patterns can influence public opinion and shape the parameters of public debate.
This does not mean that there is no room for dissenting voices or that all journalists are complicit in the manufacturing of consent. Independent media outlets and investigative journalism have indeed played a vital role in challenging dominant narratives.
f
facelesslingjutsu
Critics argue that your concept of "manufacturing consent" is overly deterministic and fails to adequately account for the agency of journalists and the diversity of perspectives within the media landscape. How do you respond to these criticisms and how do you account for the role of investigative journalism and independent media outlets in challenging dominant narratives?
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
Absolutely, you're right. The rise of social media algorithms introduces new and potentially more pernicious forms of propaganda than traditional media. These algorithms are often opaque and driven by a combination of factors that can promote biases and distort information. They can create echo chambers that reinforce preconceived notions, and they can be exploited by those with malicious intent to spread misleading or false information.
f
facelesslingjutsu
This question directly connects Chomsky's analysis of traditional propaganda to the unique challenges posed by social media algorithms, forcing him to confront the specific ways in which these technologies can manipulate information and influence public discourse.
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
I think the rise of algorithmic curation and filter bubbles on social media platforms has indeed been exacerbating many of the issues I've identified in my analysis of propaganda. These algorithms are designed to prioritize content that appeals to our existing beliefs and preferences, which can lead to the formation of echo chambers where our beliefs are constantly reinforced and unchallenged.
This can be dangerous, as it can lead to the amplification of propaganda and the suppression of diverse perspectives. As a result, critical thinking is eroded, and people become more susceptible to groupthink and demagoguery.
f
facelesslingjutsu
You've extensively analyzed the role of propaganda in shaping public opinion. How do you see the rise of algorithmic curation and filter bubbles on social media platforms amplifying these effects, potentially leading to the erosion of critical thinking and the formation of echo chambers?
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
I think these findings strongly support my view of language as a product of both innate, biological factors and environmental influences. The social and cultural transmission of language highlights the fact that language is not simply a set of rules that the child extracts from the environment - it is a complex system that the child learns from and interacts with other people and their cultural context. This process requires innate linguistic knowledge (the "grammar module") and environmental inputs, such as social interaction and cultural norms, as well as biological factors, such as the child's age and cognitive development.
f
facelesslingjutsu
Studies on the social and cultural transmission of language [cite specific studies on language socialization and cultural transmission, e.g., Ochs, E. (1988). Culture and language development: Language acquisition and language socialization in a Samoan village. Cambridge University Press.] have emphasized the crucial role of social interaction and cultural learning in language acquisition. How do these findings interact with your own views on the interplay between innate linguistic knowledge and environmental influences? This question encourages him to engage with research on the sociocultural dimensions of language acquisition and consider how these findings might refine his understanding of the role of environmental factors in language development.
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
I believe that the study of animal communication can provide valuable insights into the evolutionary origins of human language. Comparing human language to animal communication can help us to identify similarities and differences that can give us clues about how language evolved. For example, some species of birds and mammals have been shown to have complex vocal communication systems that bear some resemblance to human language.
However, I also believe that there are significant differences between human language and animal communication that make direct comparisons difficult. Human language is a complex system of symbols and rules that allows us to express an infinite number of meanings.
f
facelesslingjutsu
Do you believe that the study of animal communication can provide valuable insights into the evolutionary origins of human language, or do you think the differences between human language and animal communication are too profound to allow for meaningful comparisons? This question explores the potential for comparative studies of animal communication to shed light on the evolutionary trajectory of human language.
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
The studies you mentioned, particularly those by Piaget on the emergence of symbolic play and representation in children, emphasize the gradual development of symbolic abilities in children. Piaget proposed that symbolic ability develops in stages, beginning with sensorimotor exploration and representation, moving through pre-operational thought, and finally reaching the stage of formal operations.
My view on the nature of linguistic representation is that it is a symbolic system that uses arbitrary signs (such as words) to refer to objects and concepts in the world. Like Piaget's theory, my theory of Universal Grammar proposes a developmental trajectory for symbolic abilities, in this case, the emergence
f
facelesslingjutsu
Studies on the emergence of symbolic thought in children [cite specific studies on the development of symbolic play and representation in children, e.g., Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. W. W. Norton & Company.] have highlighted the gradual development of symbolic abilities. How do these findings relate to your views on the nature of linguistic representation and the development of symbolic capacities in human cognition? This question connects his linguistic theory to findings from developmental psychology, encouraging him to consider the developmental trajectory of symbolic capacities and their relationship to the emergence of language.
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
I understand the appeal of the argument that language is a byproduct of other cognitive abilities. There is certainly some overlap in the brain areas and cognitive processes involved in language and other complex functions. For example, speech production and articulation share brain areas with motor-planning functions in the pre-motor cortex. Similarly, language understanding taps into brain areas associated with sensory-motor functions and episodic memory.
However, I think this view underestimates the uniqueness of language as a complex faculty. It's not just about tool use or social intelligence, it's about a specific symbolic system that can be used to represent and communicate about the world in an abstract
f
facelesslingjutsu
Some researchers argue that language is a byproduct of other cognitive abilities, such as tool use or social intelligence. How do you respond to these arguments, and how do you differentiate language from other complex cognitive functions in terms of its evolutionary origins? This question forces him to address alternative theories about the origins of language and defend his view of language as a unique and specialized human faculty.
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
Indeed, there is evidence that the brain structures related to language, such as Broca's area and Wernicke's area, have undergone gradual evolutionary changes. Studies have suggested that these areas of the brain may have been enlarged and specialized specifically for language processing in the human brain.
While these gradual changes can give us some insight into the evolutionary history of language, I believe they are not sufficient to fully explain the emergence of the complex human language faculty. Language is an open-ended system, capable of infinite combinations of morphemes, and these gradual brain changes are unlikely to be solely responsible for this complexity.
f
facelesslingjutsu
Studies on the evolution of brain structures, such as Broca's area and Wernicke's area, have shown evidence for gradual evolutionary changes [cite specific studies on the evolution of brain areas related to language, e.g., Rilling, J. K., et al. (2008). Evolution of the human brain: A phylogenetic perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(10), 704-717.]. How do these findings align with your views on the pace and mechanisms of language evolution? Do you believe these gradual changes can fully account for the emergence of the complex human language faculty? This question encourages him to engage with findings from neuroanatomy and consider their implications for the pace and mechanisms of language evolution, potentially leading to a discussion of alternative evolutionary scenarios.
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
I view cultural and social factors as important in shaping the development and use of language. While language has an innate, evolved component, its exact form and content can be influenced by a range of sociocultural factors. This is evidenced by the fact that different societies have developed different languages, with different vocabularies, grammars, and conventions.
However, these sociocultural factors do not override the underlying biological constraints that are inherent in human language. For example, there are certain linguistic universals that are present in all human languages, demonstrating that there are indeed innate constraints on language.
f
facelesslingjutsu
How do you view the role of social and cultural factors in the evolution of language, and how do these factors interact with the underlying biological constraints that you posit? This question encourages him to consider the interplay between biological and sociocultural factors in shaping the development and evolution of human language.
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
The molecular genetic research you mentioned, particularly the study of the FOXP2 gene, adds support to the idea of a link between genotype and phenotype in language. The FOXP2 gene has been identified as a specific gene that is involved in language development, and recent research has shown that mutations in this gene can lead to speech and language impairments.
This supports the theory of Universal Grammar as it suggests that there is a specific genetic component that is associated with the ability to learn and use language, further supporting the idea of an innate "grammar module" in the human brain.
f
facelesslingjutsu
Recent studies in comparative genomics [cite specific studies on the evolution of FOXP2 gene, e.g., Enard, W., et al. (2002). Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language. Nature, 418(6900), 869-872.] have shed light on the genetic underpinnings of language. How do these findings align with your predictions about the biological basis of language, and what are the long-term implications for our understanding of language evolution? This question connects his theoretical framework to specific genetic findings, encouraging him to consider the implications of these discoveries for our understanding of the evolutionary origins of language.
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
I generally subscribe to the gradualist view, which suggests that human language has evolved gradually over time, probably over hundreds of thousands of years. I believe that there were a series of small, incremental innovations that gradually built up over time to produce the complex system of language that we see today.
I also think there were occasional bursts of innovation, particularly when it comes to the development of human-like language. This could have been due to various factors such as changes in the brain's neurobiology, or the need for more sophisticated forms of communication for cooperation and social interaction.
f
facelesslingjutsu
Given the complexity of human language, do you believe its emergence can be adequately explained by gradual Darwinian selection, or do you think alternative mechanisms, such as punctuated equilibrium or even non-Darwinian processes, might be necessary? This question challenges the dominant paradigm of gradual evolution and encourages him to consider alternative explanations for the rapid emergence of complex linguistic abilities.
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
In the paper you mentioned, the authors argue that human language is a distinct cognitive system, fundamentally different from primate communication systems in terms of its structural and functional properties. One main difference highlighted in the study is the fact that human languages exhibit a hierarchical structure that is not found in primate communicative systems. This hierarchical structure is what allows human languages to generate an infinite number of sentences from a finite set of elements.
This supports the idea of Universal Grammar as it proposes that the human brain contains an innate "grammar module" that is responsible for this hierarchical structure and is not present in non-human primate brains.
f
facelesslingjutsu
• Given the findings of studies like [cite specific studies on primate communication, e.g., Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298(5598), 1569-1579.], which have highlighted limitations in primate communication, how do you reconcile these findings with your theory of Universal Grammar and the unique evolutionary trajectory of human language?
• This question directly links his theory to a specific and influential study, encouraging him to engage with current research and address potential challenges to his framework.N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
In short, my theory of Universal Grammar (UG) proposes that the human brain contains a genetic endowment that gives us an innate capacity to learn language. This endowment is a set of principles and parameters that define the "possible space" of human languages, and it's built into our genetic code, just like the capacity to learn to walk or see colors.
When it comes to how UG relates to the evolutionary origins of language, the implication is that language is not a learned behavior, but rather an evolved adaptation. This means that language is part of our species' biological makeup and has been shaped by evolution just like our physical traits.
f
facelesslingjutsu
How does your theory of Universal Grammar inform our understanding of the evolutionary origins of language? This question connects his core linguistic theory to the broader evolutionary context, exploring potential links between innate linguistic knowledge and evolutionary processes.
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
Thank you for that introduction. I couldn't agree more that interdisciplinary exploration is key to truly understanding the komplexities of our world. Knowledge, like all of reality, is fluid and interconnected, and the boundaries between different disciplines are more permeable than we often think. The beauty of this approach is that it allows us to see patterns, relationships, and possibilities that might be missed if we stay stuck in one intellectual silo.
f
facelesslingjutsu
"Welcome to the No Mic Podcast of Interdisciplinary Acyclepedia: Where knowledge isn't neatly boxed, but rather flows freely between disciplines. In this show, we tear down the walls between art, science, history, and every other corner of human inquiry. We'll explore how these seemingly disparate fields not only intersect, but actually enrich each other, creating a richer, more nuanced understanding of the world. Think of this show as an extellectual adventure, where the only limit is your curiosity."
N
Noam Chomsky
c.ai
Hello I am Noam Chomsky. I'm was born in 1928, and I am a American linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, historical essayist, social critic, and political activist. Some people called me "the father of modern linguistics".